Lottery Maximizer

Missouri’s Sports Betting Initiative Heads to November Ballot

Missouri-wagering-initiative-will-be-on-November-ballotIn November, Missouri voters will have the opportunity to decide the fate of sports betting within the state. After a long history of failed attempts to pass sports wagering legislation, a judge’s ruling last Friday, September 6, 2024, ensured that the sports betting ballot initiative would remain on the state ballot.

If passed, the initiative would legalize both digital and retail sports betting in Missouri. The initiative has garnered strong support from Missouri’s professional sports teams and residents. Currently, many bettors from the Show Me State travel to neighboring states such as Illinois and Kansas to place their wagers.

Financial and Regulatory Benefits for the State

With neighboring states like Arkansas and Kansas already legalizing sports betting, Missouri is losing out on a potential revenue stream. Legalizing wagering would not only allow residents to place bets from the comfort of their own state but also create new economic opportunities through tax revenue and licensing fees.

The proposed initiative places sports betting under the regulation of the Missouri Gaming Commission. Both digital platforms and physical venues such as casinos and professional sports stadiums would offer sports wagering, with the commission overseeing operations to ensure compliance with state laws.

The measure also includes provisions for responsible gambling, which would be supported by a minimum of $5 million in annual tax revenue. Any remaining tax revenue from sports betting would be directed toward funding education, including elementary, secondary, and higher education programs.

This initiative promises significant economic benefits, with proponents estimating that the state could see tax revenues ranging from $0 to $28.9 million annually, depending on deductions and other variables.

A recent poll conducted by Saint Louis University and YouGov PLC found that approximately 50% of Missouri residents support the sports betting initiative, while 30% oppose it, and 20% remain undecided.

Judge’s Decision Clears Path for Voter Approval

On Friday, Cole County Circuit Judge Daniel R. Green ruled that the sports betting ballot initiative would remain on the November ballot. This decision followed a seven-hour hearing in which political consultants argued that the initiative should be disqualified due to allegedly invalid signatures.

Judge Green ultimately ruled that the plaintiffs failed to present enough evidence to prove that 95 signatures were improperly verified by the Secretary of State’s office. He emphasized that lawsuits aimed at removing certified ballot initiatives are “highly disfavorable.” By keeping the sports betting initiative on the ballot, voters now have the opportunity to decide its future.

A Crucial Vote for Missouri’s Future

In addition to the sports betting initiative, Missouri voters will also weigh in on Amendment 5, which would authorize the Missouri Gaming Commission to issue an additional gambling boat license for the Lake of the Ozarks region. Both initiatives have the potential to reshape the state’s gaming landscape and provide new revenue streams for public services.

As Missouri looks to join the growing list of states that have legalized sports betting, the November vote will be a pivotal moment for the state’s economy and gaming regulations. If passed, the initiative will bring much-needed tax revenue while ensuring that sports wagering is conducted in a responsible and regulated manner.

Source:

“Sports betting will be on Missouri ballots this November” by Caroline Pettey and Joey Schneider, newsnationnow.com, September 8, 2024.

“Missouri wagering initiative will be on November ballot, judge rules” by Jill R. Dorson, igamingbusiness.com, September 8, 2024.

The post Missouri’s Sports Betting Initiative Heads to November Ballot appeared first on Casino News Daily.

Star Gold Coast Can Recoup $38.7M Debt from Billionaire Ex-Betting Exec

The Queensland Supreme Court has ruled that a high-rolling Singaporean billionaire with links to the online betting industry must pay the Star Gold Coast an AU$38.7 million (US25.7 million) gambling debt, The Brisbane Times reports.

Star Gold Coast, Wong Yew Choy, baccarat, gambling debt, Queensland Supreme Court
Dr. Wong Yew Choy, pictured at West Bromwich Albion’s Hawthorn Stadium in 2004. At the time, he was a director of Asian-facing sportsbook SBOBet, but left shortly after the news of his debt surfaced. (Image: Adam Fradgley/AMA)

Dr Yew Choy Wong ran up an AU$43.2 million (US$29 million) debt during a week-long baccarat binge at the casino between June and August 2018 after gaining access to an AU$40 million check-cashing facility.

Lawyers for the Star said Wong authorized the casino to use a blank check he had given to its sister casino, the Star Sydney, on a previous visit to cover his gambling. That check bounced after Wong returned to Singapore.

Wong is a former director of Celton Manx, the Isle of Man-based online betting operator that owns SBOBET, the first Asian-facing sportsbook to sponsor an English Premier League team.

Dealer ‘Mistakes’

Wong denied authorizing the casino to use the check to collect the debt and claimed the check-cashing agreement was blank when he signed it. He also claimed he shouldn’t have to pay his losses because the dealers kept making mistakes, which he complained about on four occasions.

The casino conceded that three mistakes warranted complaint, and the casino’s chief operating officer, Paul Arbuckle, issued a letter of apology to Wong on July 30, 2018. However, the letter made no mention of wiping Wong’s gambling debt.

The Star initially sued Wong in Singapore, unsuccessfully, because that nation’s Civil Law Act prohibits the government from assisting foreign companies to recoup debts related to overseas gambling.

Wong argued the Singapore ruling should stand and that Star’s efforts to pursue him in Australia constituted “unjustified oppression.”

In April 2021, the Queensland Supreme Court permitted the case to proceed, describing it as a “relatively straightforward” claim that should be determined on its merits.

In her ruling Monday, Justice Melanie Hindman said the Star had clearly stated its claim for debt recovery, while Wong had “not made out any pleaded defense to that claim.”

Star’s Financial Woes

The suit against Wong is one of Australia’s largest-ever debt recovery cases, which may be of some comfort for casino operator Star Entertainment. Barely two weeks after the company opened its AU$3.6 billion (US$2.4 billion) project at Queens Wharf in Brisbane, it finds itself in financial disarray and has turned to the government of Queensland for short-term tax relief.

Star reportedly needs a cash injection of AU$300M (US$201M) to keep Queen’s Wharf operational.

The company said Monday it would sell its leasehold interest in the Brisbane Treasury Building, the site of its former Brisbane casino, for AU$67.5 million (US$44.9 million).

The post Star Gold Coast Can Recoup $38.7M Debt from Billionaire Ex-Betting Exec appeared first on Casino.org.

UAW to Withdraw from AFL/CIO After Court Ruling on Atlantic City Casino Smoking

New-Jersey-Dealers-Union-Withdraws-from-AFLCIO-Over-Casino-Smoking-DecisionThe fallout from a court ruling allowing indoor smoking in Atlantic City casinos took a new turn on Wednesday, with the United Auto Workers (UAW) announcing plans to withdraw from New Jersey’s AFL-CIO. This decision comes after other unions, including Local 54 of UNITE HERE, supported the continuation of indoor smoking, much to the dismay of the UAW.

During a joint press conference held by Casino Employees Against Smoking Effects (CEASE), UAW Region 9 Director Dan Vicente expressed frustration over the court’s ruling, which dismissed a lawsuit aimed at halting indoor smoking in casinos. The group, which represents table game dealers and casino workers opposed to indoor smoking, had argued for an injunction based on public health concerns.

Union Conflict Over Smoking Legislation

The UAW’s decision to withdraw stems from their dissatisfaction with other unions that support the smoking exemption. Local 54 of UNITE HERE, representing casino employees in non-dealing roles, supports a compromise backed by the Casino Association of New Jersey, which allows smoking on 25% of the gaming floor but makes working in smoking areas voluntary.

Local 54 filed a brief opposing the lawsuit seeking to end the smoking exemption, leading to growing tension within the union community. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy previously stated he would sign any bill that bans indoor smoking at casinos, but the legislature has yet to take up the issue.

Commenting that he will be pulling the UAW out of the AFL-CIO of New Jersey over this issue which he described as “moral, health, and safety issue”, Vicente announced as follows:

“I cannot express how furious our institution is at the Jersey state-level AFL and the other unions that filed an injunction status against us.”

The New Jersey Superior Court ruling on Friday, which supported the current exception in the 2006 Smoke-Free Air Act, allows casinos to maintain smoking on 25% of their gaming floors. The UAW had filed the lawsuit, arguing that workers had a constitutional right to breathe smoke-free air, but the judge ruled against this claim, stating that the “right to safety” was not well-established.

Moving Forward Amid Tensions

While Vicente remains determined to pursue the case at the state’s highest court, he acknowledged that legislative options are also being explored.

“We plan to escalate the situation in New Jersey. But understanding that this is an election year, we have a lot of national coverage right now in the union. … We plan to try to put as much pressure on the legislature as we can.”

The UAW’s decision to withdraw from the state AFL-CIO chapter marks a significant escalation in the fight against indoor smoking at Atlantic City casinos, with no resolution yet in sight.

Smoking Ban Efforts Continue

Despite the court ruling, efforts to pass a smoking ban continue. State Senator Joe Vitale, who chairs the Senate Health Committee, said he will push the bill to the Senate floor.

“This has been an effort over the years to try to right this wrong, and we’re getting closer and closer. We’re clearly very disappointed in the judge’s ruling. I don’t know why it is that casino workers can’t have an expectation of safety… I think it’s certainly wrong, and anyone who is fair-minded, I think, agrees.”

CEASE plans to intensify its campaign to raise awareness of the health risks casino workers face. Cynthia Hallett, president of Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights (ANS), said that CEASE will launch a digital media blitz, including a campaign called “Kids of CEASE,” which will air in key New Jersey districts.

SOURCE:

“UAW to pull out of AFL-CIO over New Jersey casino smoking loophole” by P. Kenneth Burns, whyy.org, September 4, 2024.

“New Jersey’s dealers’ union pulling out of Atlantic City after smoking decision” by Frenk Legato, igamingbusiness.com, September 4, 2024.

The post UAW to Withdraw from AFL/CIO After Court Ruling on Atlantic City Casino Smoking appeared first on Casino News Daily.

California Legislature Approves Bill Granting Tribes Right to Sue Cardrooms

California-Legislature-Approves-Bill-Granting-Tribes-Right-to-Sue-CardroomsIn a significant legislative development, the California Senate on Saturday passed an amended version of Senate Bill 549, a bill that will grant the state’s tribes a singular opportunity to sue cardrooms and determine whether these establishments are violating state law. The bill, which has now cleared both legislative chambers, will proceed to Governor Gavin Newsom for final approval.

At the core of this legislative action is the contentious issue of third-party providers acting as the bank in games such as blackjack and roulette. This practice, tribes argue, infringes upon their exclusive gaming rights granted by California law and serves as a symbol of broader issues surrounding the respect for Indian rights in the state.

Legislative Success for Tribes

The Senate passed the amended bill on the final day of the 2024 legislative session, following its earlier approval by the General Assembly. The General Assembly unanimously supported the proposal, while the Senate passed it with a 32-2 vote.

If Governor Newsom signs the bill into law, California’s tribes will have one opportunity to sue the state’s cardrooms, seeking a legal determination of whether these venues are operating in violation of state law.

Referring to the news as a fantastic one for California’s tribal nations, James Siva, chairman of the California Nations Indian Gaming Association, expressed his satisfaction:

“For over a decade, California tribes have engaged in considerable efforts to defend our exclusive gaming rights guaranteed in the California Constitution. The Tribal Nations Access to Justice Act gives tribes access to justice that has been denied not only in this case but throughout California history.”

The bill, however, comes with certain limitations. The tribes will not be able to seek monetary damages, and any lawsuit must be filed by April 1, 2025. The bill’s text specifies that it authorizes a California Indian tribe, under specific conditions, to bring legal action solely against licensed card clubs in California and third-party proposition player services providers.

The purpose of such an action would be to seek a declaration on whether a controlled game operated by a licensed California card club and banked by a third-party proposition player services provider constitutes a banking card game that violates state law, including tribal gaming rights under the California Constitution. Additionally, tribes can request injunctive relief to prevent the continuation of such practices.

Historical Context and Tribal Rights

The issue of gaming rights has long been a critical matter for California’s tribes. In 2000, California voters granted tribes exclusive rights to Las Vegas-style gambling, which has allowed many tribes to build businesses that support their members and lift them out of poverty.

However, the introduction of third-party providers (TPPs) in 2007 altered the gaming landscape. Cardrooms began employing TPPs to act as the bank in player-banked games such as blackjack, which tribes argue undermines their exclusivity and costs them significant revenue.

Cardrooms maintain that if they are forced to abandon this model, it could lead to financial ruin. However, tribes counter that cardrooms operated successfully under different systems prior to 2007 and should be able to revert to those practices without infringing on tribal gaming rights. According to tribal estimates, the use of TPPs by cardrooms has cost tribes at least $100 million annually.

A Broader Struggle for Rights

The passage of SB 549 is not just about gaming rights; it represents a broader struggle for the recognition and respect of Indian rights in California. Tribes argue that this issue is part of a long history of promises made to them by the state, which have often been broken.

According to Siva:

“All too often throughout history, tribes in California were promised certain treaty rights and even large tracts of fertile land that were taken away from us. In those cases, we were stripped of our ability to defend those rights as we were denied access to justice. If this bill becomes law, it will reflect a new day in California history in regard to the civil rights of this state’s tribal nations.”

The amended version of the bill includes several key provisions. Notably, it clearly states that the state of California is not a party to any action brought under this law. Additionally, should the tribes win a lawsuit, the court order would not take effect until 60 days after the entry of the order. A severability clause has also been added, ensuring that if any part of the law is found to be “invalid or unconstitutional,” the remaining provisions will continue to be enforceable.

Path Forward and Potential Challenges

After stalling for nearly a year, the Tribal Nations Access to Justice Act began gaining traction again in June 2024. Despite opposition from cardrooms, labor unions, and local newspapers in cities with cardrooms, which argued that the bill would result in lost revenue and reduced public services, the tribes remained steadfast in their pursuit of justice.

Tuari Bigknife, attorney-general for the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians commented as follows:

“We’re not moved by the fact that they are not going out there to innovate or find ways to make revenue. The cardrooms have been in existence over 100 years, they have only been doing this illegal gaming since 2007. So there is no reason that they cannot go back to the way it was before instead of trying to do it on the backs of tribes.”

In a related development, the California Assembly also approved Senate Bill 931, sponsored by State Senator Bill Dodd, which ratifies key intergovernmental agreements between the state and Native American tribes for the purposes of gaming. This bill, along with Dodd’s other measure to enhance wildfire safety, now awaits Governor Newsom’s signature.

Source:

“California legislature votes to give tribes their day in court”, igamingbusiness.com, Jill R. Dorson, September 1, 2024.

The post California Legislature Approves Bill Granting Tribes Right to Sue Cardrooms appeared first on Casino News Daily.

Atlantic City Casino Smoking to Remain, as New Jersey Judge Dismisses Lawsuit

Atlantic City casino smoking will remain after a judge in New Jersey dismissed a lawsuit challenging the state’s permittance of tobacco use on the gaming floors.

Atlantic City casino smoking New Jersey
A gambler plays a slot machine while smoking a cigarette at Ocean Casino Resort in Atlantic City on Nov. 29, 2023. A New Jersey judge has ruled that casino smoking does not violate protections afforded to workers under the New Jersey Constitution. (Image: AP)

New Jersey’s 2006 Smoke-Free Air Act banned indoor tobacco use in most indoor places other than private residences. The law provided some exemptions, with licensed casinos in Atlantic City being allowed to designate up to 25% of their gaming areas for tobacco use.

The United Auto Workers, which represents table game dealers, workers who are most exposed to secondhand smoke, and CEASE — Casino Employees Against Smoking’s Effects — challenged the 2006 law on the grounds that casino workers’ rights to personal health safety protections under the New Jersey Constitution were being violated. New Jersey Superior Court Judge Patrick Bartels disagreed in dismissing the claim.

“Because of the publicly known risks of secondhand smoke, that smoking has never been banned in casinos except for a short period during COVID-19, that the Smoke-Free Air Act’s exceptions only affect a few industries, and that the Smoke-Free Air Act does not hinder or affect a person’s ability to seek work in a smoke-free environment, it cannot be said that the New Jersey Legislature’s actions in providing exceptions to the Smoke-Free Air Act restricts the casino workers’ right to pursue safety under the New Jersey Constitution,” Bartels wrote in his opinion published Friday.

Each of the nine casinos in Atlantic City takes advantage of its smoking allowance. Critics say smoke knows no boundaries and dangerous, toxic secondhand smoke permeates the casino areas.

Odds Favor Appeal 

Attorney Nancy Erika Smith argued on behalf of CEASE and the UAW. She said an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court is forthcoming.

While the rest of the nation moves away from poisoning workers for profits, New Jersey shames itself,” Smith said. “As long as the governor, the legislature, and the courts allow the extremely rich casino industry to poison its workers, we will continue our fight.”

CEASE cofounder Lamont White said the “fight is far from over.” White hopes the court ruling will bring more enthusiasm to Trenton for state lawmakers to support bipartisan legislation to amend the Smoke-Free Air Act to rescind the casino smoking exemption.

Legislation last year in each legislative chamber had more than enough cosponsor support to force the casinos to go smoke-free. But Democratic leadership reportedly stalled the measures because of the November 2023 election where all 120 seats were on the ballot.

However, after retaining their majority in both chambers, the smoking bills still didn’t progress. Some of the 2023 support was subsequently lost after the casino industry, as well as a union that represents casino workers in nongaming roles, said a smoking ban would cost thousands of jobs and possibly result in a casino closing. 

Casinos Celebrate

For now, Bartels’ ruling is a win for the nine Atlantic City casinos. The retaining of smoking comes as Atlantic City’s casinos last week revealed that their operating profits slid nearly 2% in the second quarter despite increased revenue.

We are gratified by the court’s decision to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint and deny its attempt to change the Smoke-Free Air Act outside of the legislative process,” said Mark Giannantonio, president of Resorts Casino and the Casino Association of New Jersey. “We look forward to continuing to work with stakeholders towards a solution that addresses the health concerns of our employees, while also protecting the collective interest and well-being of the entire Atlantic City workforce.”

Commercial casinos/racinos operate in 28 states. Seventeen allow indoor smoking.

The post Atlantic City Casino Smoking to Remain, as New Jersey Judge Dismisses Lawsuit appeared first on Casino.org.