Italy Pushes New Gambling Law Amid Malta’s Opposition

italy-defies-malta-and-forges-ahead-with-new-gambling-lawThe Italian government has confirmed its decision to move forward with its revamped gambling legislation, despite objections from Malta. This development marks a significant milestone in Italy’s effort to consolidate and reform its gambling regulations, with the new law expected to reshape the sector and generate substantial tax revenue.

Italy Dismisses Malta’s Concerns

Malta’s objections centered on several key areas of the proposed legislation, including the licensing requirements for B2B operators, restrictions on managing “skins” or secondary brands under a single license, and enhanced safeguards to prevent underage gambling. Malta argued that the new rules could create unnecessary barriers for operators and urged Italy to account for existing European licenses.

However, the Italian government dismissed these concerns, emphasizing the law’s adherence to EU principles. It clarified that B2B companies will not require separate concessions, as the term “service provider” applies only to operators offering direct services to consumers. Furthermore, Italy defended its approach to technological neutrality, stating that the measures governing websites and apps are identical, ensuring fair treatment across platforms.

“The proposed Technical Rules are adherent to the principles and EU law,” the Italian government asserted, adding that the new regulations aim to enhance consumer protections and ensure fair competition in the Italian gambling market.

Key Features of the New Law

The new legislation in Italy introduces significant reforms designed to streamline the gambling industry and prioritize responsible gaming. Key aspects include:

  • Licensing and Fees: Online gambling operators must pay a €7 million fee for a nine-year license. A concessionaire’s operating fee of 3% and a 0.2% levy on annual net revenues will also be implemented.
  • Player Protections: Stricter safeguards for young players aged 18 to 24, including mandatory monetary and session limits during account registration. Self-exclusion options and time-limit warnings will also be required.
  • Technological Neutrality: Equal treatment for websites and mobile apps, ensuring consistent regulatory standards across platforms.
  • Data Hosting Compliance: Gambling platforms must host IT infrastructure within the European Economic Area (EEA) to comply with EU data protection standards.

The reforms are expected to bring substantial economic benefits, with the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) projecting that at least 50 operators will apply for licenses, generating €350 million in initial revenue.

Implications for the Industry

The new law signals a shift in Italy’s approach to gambling regulation, prioritizing sustainability and consumer protection while streamlining processes for operators. A dedicated department within the Agency of Customs and Monopolies will oversee gambling activities, ensuring compliance and managing the tender process for licenses.

Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has endorsed the reforms, which aim to combat gambling addiction, protect minors, and support social initiatives through increased tax revenue. The Italian gambling sector, which raised €11 billion in 2022, is poised for further growth under the new framework.

Industry Response

While Malta’s objections led to a brief delay during the European Commission’s mandatory review period, the Italian government has remained steadfast in its position. With the upcoming issuance of licenses, the focus now shifts to how these reforms will impact operators and consumers alike.

The streamlined licensing process, coupled with robust player protections, sets the stage for a more responsible and transparent gambling environment in Italy. Industry stakeholders will be closely monitoring the rollout of the new concessions and their long-term effects on the market.

Source:

Italy to Go Ahead with New Gambling Law“, ICLG, November 21, 2024. 

The post Italy Pushes New Gambling Law Amid Malta’s Opposition appeared first on Casino News Daily.

Texas Sports Betting Unlikely Before 2027 Amid Rising Opposition

Indy-Gaming-Why-Texas-is-for-now-not-likely-to-legalize-sports-bettingEfforts to legalize sports betting in Texas are facing substantial hurdles, largely due to increased lobbying and campaign contributions aimed at legalizing casinos in the state. These actions have galvanized anti-gaming forces in Texas, reducing the likelihood that sports betting will be legalized in the near future.

According to a recent report by Eilers & Krejcik Gaming, a Southern California advisory firm specializing in sports betting analysis, Texas has been removed from the list of states likely to legalize sports betting by 2025. The firm attributes this decision to the intensifying opposition to gambling in Texas, driven primarily by efforts from Las Vegas Sands Corp.

Las Vegas Sands has invested millions of dollars over the past decade in failed attempts to legalize casinos in Texas. The company is once again leading a push for a casino bill as the state approaches its biennial legislative session. Despite these efforts, opposition to gambling in the state has only strengthened, creating significant obstacles for the legalization of sports betting.

The Texas Tribune reported in May that Miriam Adelson, who controls 53 percent of Las Vegas Sands, contributed $9 million to the Texas Defense Fund, a political action committee that supported Republican incumbents in the Texas House during the primary elections. In addition to this political involvement, Adelson spent $3.5 billion in December to acquire a 73 percent stake in the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks. The team, which recently lost to the Boston Celtics in the NBA Finals, is expected to advocate for a new arena in Dallas, potentially tied to a future hotel-casino resort operated by Las Vegas Sands.

Mark Cuban, co-owner of the Mavericks who retained a 27 percent stake in the team, emphasized the importance of the casino aspect of the project. Speaking at a sports economics forum in Dallas, Cuban stated, “The 10 percent of the people who gamble pay for everything else,” highlighting the financial viability of integrating a casino into the project.

Andy Abboud, Senior Vice President of Sands, also spoke at a recent event hosted by the North Texas Commission, a public-private partnership that includes Dallas-area businesses and local governments. Abboud briefed business leaders on the potential benefits of destination gaming, with the commission forming an exploratory committee to examine the issue further.

However, these initiatives have only intensified opposition from Texas’ anti-gaming faction, which is predominantly led by Republicans in the Texas State Senate. Chris Krafcik, an analyst from Eilers & Krejcik, noted that while the Texas House passed an online sports betting bill in 2023—backed by major sports betting companies, a coalition of Texas’ professional sports teams, and former Texas Gov. Rick Perry—it was ultimately blocked in the Senate. This development supports Krafcik’s view that “the Senate is the chamber that matters, and things there are not moving in the right direction.”

Krafcik also pointed out that the Texas Republican Party has explicitly instructed lawmakers to oppose any form of gambling expansion, as well as any budget proposals that include revenue from legalized gambling. He highlighted the party’s firm stance against gambling, noting that “[the party’s platform]

even explicitly addresses the warmer reception gambling expansion has had in the House.”

Given these challenges, Krafcik now believes that Texas may not legalize sports betting until at least 2027, with the earliest possible launch coinciding with the NFL season opener in the fall of 2028.

Source:

Indy Gaming: Why Texas is, for now, not likely to legalize sports betting, thenevadaindependent.com, August 21, 2024.

The post Texas Sports Betting Unlikely Before 2027 Amid Rising Opposition appeared first on Casino News Daily.

Nebraska’s Online Sports Betting Expansion Faces Opposition

Nebraska-leaders-voice-opposition-to-online-sports-betting-expansionIn Nebraska, the conversation about expanding online sports betting has reached a critical juncture, as notable state figures, including former football coach Tom Osborne, articulate their opposition. This discussion aligns with the state’s contemplation of two constitutional amendments that would permit voters to decide on online mobile sports wagering in the upcoming November ballot.

Voices of Concern Against Online Betting

Osborne, along with other prominent figures such as former Governor Kay Orr, U.S. Senator Pete Ricketts, and State Auditor Mike Foley, has publicly expressed concerns regarding the potential social costs of expanding gambling. In a collective statement, they cautioned lawmakers about the economic and social repercussions, particularly highlighting the risks of increased gambling addiction among the youth. “I see this being very dangerous, particularly for young people,” Osborne stated, asserting, “I can guarantee you there will be increased addiction and increased costs.”

Economic Arguments for Expansion

Contrasting Osborne’s apprehensions, State Senator Eliot Bostar advocates for the expansion, arguing that Nebraska is forfeiting significant revenue to neighboring states, notably Iowa. Bostar, who introduced the constitutional amendment LR 3, claims that Nebraska is losing approximately $32 million annually. He proposes that this money could instead be utilized to reduce property taxes within the state. “Nebraska is giving them a tremendous amount of money. I think we should keep that. I think we should use that money to lower property taxes,” Bostar emphasized.

A recent industry-conducted poll supports Bostar’s position, indicating that 65% of respondents favor online sports wagering if the generated revenue aids in property tax relief. Lance Morgan of Ho-Chunk noted, “This is new tax revenue. It’s not a shift. Although we’re shifting from Iowa which is going to lose $100 million.”

Technical Insights and Public Sentiment

Supporting the economic argument, Danny DiRienzo from GeoComply shared data reflecting half a million bets placed just across the border in Iowa, likely by Nebraskans. This statistic underscores the prevalence of cross-border betting and the potential retention of these funds within Nebraska if online betting were legalized.

Governor Jim Pillen has suggested that the decision on online sports betting should be left to voters, although he acknowledges the concerns raised by his former coach and other opposition figures. “Promoting online sports betting will not result in a net benefit in Nebraska taxpayers,” Osborne concluded.

Legislative and Public Debate Continues

As Nebraska lawmakers continue to debate the proposed legislation during special sessions focused on reducing state property taxes, the outcome remains uncertain. No definitive actions were taken during the recent hearings, but the dialogue reflects a significant divide between economic benefits and social risks associated with online sports betting.

Whether Nebraska will join the growing number of states embracing online sports betting or heed the cautionary advice of its notable figures is yet to be seen. The decision will likely resonate far beyond the November ballot, shaping the state’s economic landscape and social policies.

Source:

Nebraska leaders voice opposition to online sports betting expansion, ketv.com, August 1, 2024.

The post Nebraska’s Online Sports Betting Expansion Faces Opposition appeared first on Casino News Daily.