Loterj Operators Secured by Court Ruling Amid Federal Betting Regulations

Brazil-court-confirms-Rio-Loterj-licensees-can-remain-active-without-a-federal-licenceIn response to new federal betting regulations, the Brazilian government implemented significant changes in September with the introduction of Normative Ordinance No 1,475. This ordinance allowed only operators who had already applied for a federal betting license and were actively operating to continue doing so until the official launch of the regulated market on January 1, 2025. The deadline for submitting license applications passed on September 30, prompting a wave of last-minute submissions from businesses hoping to remain compliant.

A total of 182 applications were submitted via Brazil’s Sigap betting management system by the deadline. However, one submission, from Tecnologia e Desenvolvimento Ltda, was entered after the deadline, leaving it potentially vulnerable to the upcoming regulations.

Concerns Raised by State Lottery-Licensed Brands

The new federal rules sparked concerns among operators licensed under state lotteries like Loterj, the Rio de Janeiro State Lottery. These brands worried about their ability to continue operating beyond the October 1 deadline without a federal license. Fortunately for them, a ruling from Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court (STF) on October 1 provided a crucial exemption, protecting Loterj operators from the consequences of missing the federal deadline.

Federal judge Antônio Cláudio Macedo da Silva criticized the federal regulations for conflicting with Loterj’s Accreditation Notice 001/2023. This notice, which permits accredited entities to operate public lottery services for up to five years, was deemed incompatible with the federal ordinances regarding the advertisement and banning of unlicensed betting websites.

Loterj Operators Exempt from Federal Regulations

According to the court’s injunction, Loterj license holders retain “broad and unrestricted rights” to continue offering fixed-odds online betting. This exemption applies as long as their bettors are in Rio de Janeiro. The court found that the federal ordinances extended beyond the scope of federal jurisdiction and interfered with the regulatory authority of Brazil’s states. In his ruling, Judge Macedo da Silva stated that the ordinances violate Law No 13,756/2018, which supports the legality of previous legal acts, thus protecting Loterj operators from federal restrictions.

This decision was largely influenced by a previous ruling in 2020 that declared the federal monopoly on lotteries unconstitutional. The ruling permitted individual states and federal districts to establish their own lotteries, subsequently allowing operators in states like Rio de Janeiro to run sports betting under state licenses.

Previous Court Decisions Shape the Current Landscape

The STF’s 2020 ruling had already set a precedent for state-run lotteries like Loterj, deeming the federal lottery monopoly unconstitutional. Sports betting, which falls under the broader category of lottery games in Federal Law No 13,756/2018, has since been allowed under Loterj state licenses. This gave operators within Rio de Janeiro and other regions like Paraná the ability to offer sports betting under local jurisdiction.

Local legal experts, including Eduardo Carvalhaes and Karen Coutinho from Lefosse, expressed confidence that state-licensed operators would remain unaffected by the new federal restrictions. They explained that operators authorized under state licenses, such as Loterj, should continue their operations unhindered, even as unlicensed betting sites face new federal limitations.

Federal Injunction Secures Loterj’s Rights

In the days leading up to October 1, Loterj filed a lawsuit in federal court to prevent the blocking or banning of sportsbooks authorized within Rio de Janeiro. This legal challenge, aimed at the Ministry of Finance’s Prizes and Betting Secretariat, sought to overturn federal Ordinances No 1,225, 1,231, and 1,475, which imposed strict rules on advertising and site operation for unlicensed operators.

Loterj argued that these ordinances interfered with its regulatory authority by blocking sportsbooks that had not applied for federal licenses. In its writ of mandamus, Loterj emphasized the legality and regularity of its licensees’ operations within Rio de Janeiro, asserting that the federal government lacked the authority to prevent these operators from advertising or continuing to offer services.

Judge Macedo da Silva sided with Loterj, issuing an injunction that suspended the effects of the federal ordinances within Rio de Janeiro. His ruling ensured that Loterj operators could continue offering fixed-odds betting online without the need for dual accreditation from the federal government.

The court’s decision also clarified that bettors must declare that all wagers are placed within the state of Rio de Janeiro for taxation and legal purposes. With this ruling, Loterj operators can continue advertising their services and sponsoring events across Brazil, free from the penalties imposed by federal regulations.

Source:

Loterj gets injunction in defense of ‘Bets’ operating in Rio without requesting a federal license“, gamesbras.com, October 1, 2024.

The post Loterj Operators Secured by Court Ruling Amid Federal Betting Regulations appeared first on Casino News Daily.

UAW to Withdraw from AFL/CIO After Court Ruling on Atlantic City Casino Smoking

New-Jersey-Dealers-Union-Withdraws-from-AFLCIO-Over-Casino-Smoking-DecisionThe fallout from a court ruling allowing indoor smoking in Atlantic City casinos took a new turn on Wednesday, with the United Auto Workers (UAW) announcing plans to withdraw from New Jersey’s AFL-CIO. This decision comes after other unions, including Local 54 of UNITE HERE, supported the continuation of indoor smoking, much to the dismay of the UAW.

During a joint press conference held by Casino Employees Against Smoking Effects (CEASE), UAW Region 9 Director Dan Vicente expressed frustration over the court’s ruling, which dismissed a lawsuit aimed at halting indoor smoking in casinos. The group, which represents table game dealers and casino workers opposed to indoor smoking, had argued for an injunction based on public health concerns.

Union Conflict Over Smoking Legislation

The UAW’s decision to withdraw stems from their dissatisfaction with other unions that support the smoking exemption. Local 54 of UNITE HERE, representing casino employees in non-dealing roles, supports a compromise backed by the Casino Association of New Jersey, which allows smoking on 25% of the gaming floor but makes working in smoking areas voluntary.

Local 54 filed a brief opposing the lawsuit seeking to end the smoking exemption, leading to growing tension within the union community. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy previously stated he would sign any bill that bans indoor smoking at casinos, but the legislature has yet to take up the issue.

Commenting that he will be pulling the UAW out of the AFL-CIO of New Jersey over this issue which he described as “moral, health, and safety issue”, Vicente announced as follows:

“I cannot express how furious our institution is at the Jersey state-level AFL and the other unions that filed an injunction status against us.”

The New Jersey Superior Court ruling on Friday, which supported the current exception in the 2006 Smoke-Free Air Act, allows casinos to maintain smoking on 25% of their gaming floors. The UAW had filed the lawsuit, arguing that workers had a constitutional right to breathe smoke-free air, but the judge ruled against this claim, stating that the “right to safety” was not well-established.

Moving Forward Amid Tensions

While Vicente remains determined to pursue the case at the state’s highest court, he acknowledged that legislative options are also being explored.

“We plan to escalate the situation in New Jersey. But understanding that this is an election year, we have a lot of national coverage right now in the union. … We plan to try to put as much pressure on the legislature as we can.”

The UAW’s decision to withdraw from the state AFL-CIO chapter marks a significant escalation in the fight against indoor smoking at Atlantic City casinos, with no resolution yet in sight.

Smoking Ban Efforts Continue

Despite the court ruling, efforts to pass a smoking ban continue. State Senator Joe Vitale, who chairs the Senate Health Committee, said he will push the bill to the Senate floor.

“This has been an effort over the years to try to right this wrong, and we’re getting closer and closer. We’re clearly very disappointed in the judge’s ruling. I don’t know why it is that casino workers can’t have an expectation of safety… I think it’s certainly wrong, and anyone who is fair-minded, I think, agrees.”

CEASE plans to intensify its campaign to raise awareness of the health risks casino workers face. Cynthia Hallett, president of Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights (ANS), said that CEASE will launch a digital media blitz, including a campaign called “Kids of CEASE,” which will air in key New Jersey districts.

SOURCE:

“UAW to pull out of AFL-CIO over New Jersey casino smoking loophole” by P. Kenneth Burns, whyy.org, September 4, 2024.

“New Jersey’s dealers’ union pulling out of Atlantic City after smoking decision” by Frenk Legato, igamingbusiness.com, September 4, 2024.

The post UAW to Withdraw from AFL/CIO After Court Ruling on Atlantic City Casino Smoking appeared first on Casino News Daily.

Seminole Tribe, DeSantis Win Florida Sports Bet Ruling

seminole_tribe_desantis_win_florida_sports_bet_rulingAn error by a federal judge soon after sportsbooks launched in Florida lawmakers on the budget committee along with recipients of state funding as well as Gov. Ron DeSantis have scored a rather large victory in court – worth at least $2.5 billion and as much as $6b by some estimates.

A three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a challenge to the 2021 state/tribal gaming compact in Florida that authorized the Seminole Tribe there to offer mobile sports betting. The practice was banned soon after books opened for business in 2021 and online sports betting in the state has been deemed in violation of the law since that time.

Sports Betting Could Open Back Up in Florida Right Away

However, that could change at any time with the new ruling. Sportsbetting could return to Florida virtually overnight.

In a nutshell, the judges decided that any conflict with the opposing party needed to be settled under state law as none of the assertions made actually had anything to do with federal law. So, while it may appear to be a landmark decision, it was really more of a venue correction than anything else in the final analysis and an appeal by the plaintiffs could send the industry right back into a death spiral at any time with a challenge to the decision and an injunction.

The Seminole Tribe applauded the decision but stopped short of saying it would resume sports betting right away.

A lawyer representing the casinos that had challenged the compact pointed out what the plaintiff side saw as nonsensical – according to Hamish Hume, the court had somehow “recognized” that federal gambling laws “cannot authorize gambling off of Indian lands, but then upheld a compact that purports on its face to do exactly that.”

The legal counsel stated, “We respectfully disagree with that decision, and are evaluating our possible next steps.”

The federal appeals court’s reversal of a lower court judge’s order was personally and politically important for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis because he personally lobbied lawmakers to pass the compact in 2021.

A spokesman for the governor stated: “While we are not surprised the lower court’s perplexing ruling was unanimously overturned, this is great news for Florida,” Mahon said in an email to Politico. “We will continue working with the Seminole Tribe of Florida to ensure the success of this historic compact — the largest gaming compact in US history.”

A spokesman for the Seminole Tribe said of the most recent decision: “The Seminole Tribe of Florida is pleased with today’s unanimous decision. It is a positive outcome for the Seminole Tribe and the people of Florida and for all of Indian Country. The Tribe is fully reviewing the decision to determine its next steps.”

New Compact Also Authorizes Table Games

In addition to authorizing sports betting the “new compact” also allowed the tribe to offer table games such as craps and roulette to its existing slots casinos and to build at least one more casino on its reservation the Hollywood area which already has a Hard Rock Hotel & Casino.

In the ruling that blocked implementation of the compact, D.C. District Judge Dabney Friedrich decided the compact was beyond what the laws allowed because it let people place sports bets anywhere in the state – which could be a violation of federal law that govern gambling on Tribal lands.

The impetus of the adverse decision was a pair of lawsuits brought by an anti-gambling group active in Florida, another that focuses primarily on the southern part of the state and casino competitors. Plaintiffs had sued U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland, who didn’t block the compact but instead took no action and allowed it to automatically come into effect after some time as prescribed by law.

The erring judge also determined that it would take a new citizens’ initiative to authorize sports betting under the premise that voters passed a law in 2018 that required any expansion of casino gambling without a citizen’s initiative – that law was supported by both Disney Corp and the Tribe.

The Tribe and DeSantis relied on the legal theory that bets processed on servers physically situated on tribal lands were indeed placed “on the Reservation”. The Trump-appointed judge called that a “fiction” and stated that: “When a federal statute authorizes an activity only at specific locations, parties may not evade that limitation by ‘deeming’ their activity to occur where it, as a factual matter, does not.”

The panel of D.C. appeals court judges in essence said that neither argument mattered in this instance: “Whether it is otherwise lawful for a patron to place bets from non-tribal land within Florida may be a question for that State’s courts, but it is not the subject of this litigation and not for us to decide.”

We hold only that the Secretary’s decision not to act on the Compact was consistent with <federal law>,” wrote Wilkins who added, “We express no opinion as to whether the Florida statute ratifying the compact is constitutional” under Florida law.

The balance of arguments raised by the litigants against the legality of the compact was also summarily dismissed as a ‘matter for state courts to decide’.

Source: DeSantis scores big legal win upholding $2.5B gambling deal with Florida tribe, Politico, June 30, 2023

The post Seminole Tribe, DeSantis Win Florida Sports Bet Ruling appeared first on Casino News Daily.